Summarize this content to 200 words
As a former (NA) MX-5 owner myself, I was rather excited at the prospect of the RF. It sounded like all the MX-5 stuff I loved, but with less risk of someone slashing the hood, and maybe a more refined interior.
The weather mostly sucked while we had the RF, so the roof stayed up a lot.
Credit:
Jonathan Gitlin
While I am sure the RF is more vandal-resistant, again I have to report that the hardtop makes this car, if anything, less refined to drive. There’s a sound-deadening panel that I am sure wasn’t fitted to the first RF we drove in 2017, but with the roof up, conversations with your passenger sound tinny, never mind anything played on the audio system. By comparison, the soft top soaks up some of the road noise without turning the interior into a resonating tin can.
Roof-down is not really much better. It’s the buttresses, which catch the air behind your head and make noise in the process. Raising the windows alleviates this, but only a little. You have to pay extra for this, too—a bit less than $3,000 depending on spec.
Still a joy to drive
So far, so not-great. But the rest of the MX-5 recipe is still sound, even if the RF remix is a little lacking. Under the hood is a 2.0 L four-cylinder Skyactiv-G engine, with 181 hp (135 kW) and 151 lb-ft (205 Nm), which is…
Source Domain:arstechnica.com
Redirect url:https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/08/2025-mazda-mx-5-rf-review-why-this-folding-hardtop-isnt-the-one-to-get/
decoded:https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/08/2025-mazda-mx-5-rf-review-why-this-folding-hardtop-isnt-the-one-to-get/
author:Jonathan M. Gitlin
title_words_as_hashtags:#Mazda #MX5 #review #Buy #soft #top #hardtop #sucks
title_words_as_slug:2025-mazda-mx-5-rf-review-buy-the-soft-top-the-hardtop-sucks
Source link